
Modified Index of Agreement
md.RdThis function computes the modified Index of Agreement between sim and obs, with treatment of missing values.
Usage
md(sim, obs, ...)
# Default S3 method
md(sim, obs, j=1, na.rm=TRUE, fun=NULL, ...,
epsilon.type=c("none", "Pushpalatha2012", "otherFactor", "otherValue"),
epsilon.value=NA)
# S3 method for class 'data.frame'
md(sim, obs, j=1, na.rm=TRUE, fun=NULL, ...,
epsilon.type=c("none", "Pushpalatha2012", "otherFactor", "otherValue"),
epsilon.value=NA)
# S3 method for class 'matrix'
md(sim, obs, j=1, na.rm=TRUE, fun=NULL, ...,
epsilon.type=c("none", "Pushpalatha2012", "otherFactor", "otherValue"),
epsilon.value=NA)
# S3 method for class 'zoo'
md(sim, obs, j=1, na.rm=TRUE, fun=NULL, ...,
epsilon.type=c("none", "Pushpalatha2012", "otherFactor", "otherValue"),
epsilon.value=NA)Arguments
- sim
numeric, zoo, matrix or data.frame with simulated values
- obs
numeric, zoo, matrix or data.frame with observed values
- j
numeric, with the exponent to be used in the computation of the modified index of agreement. The default value is j=1.
- na.rm
a logical value indicating whether 'NA' should be stripped before the computation proceeds.
When an 'NA' value is found at the i-th position inobsORsim, the i-th value ofobsANDsimare removed before the computation.- fun
function to be applied to
simandobsin order to obtain transformed values thereof before computing the modified index of agreement.The first argument MUST BE a numeric vector with any name (e.g.,
x), and additional arguments are passed using....- ...
arguments passed to
fun, in addition to the mandatory first numeric vector.- epsilon.type
argument used to define a numeric value to be added to both
simandobsbefore applyingfun.It is was designed to allow the use of logarithm and other similar functions that do not work with zero values.
Valid values of
epsilon.typeare:1) "none":
simandobsare used byfunwithout the addition of any nummeric value.2) "Pushpalatha2012": one hundredth (1/100) of the mean observed values is added to both
simandobsbefore applyingfun, as described in Pushpalatha et al. (2012).3) "otherFactor": the numeric value defined in the
epsilon.valueargument is used to multiply the the mean observed values, instead of the one hundredth (1/100) described in Pushpalatha et al. (2012). The resulting value is then added to bothsimandobs, before applyingfun.4) "otherValue": the numeric value defined in the
epsilon.valueargument is directly added to bothsimandobs, before applyingfun.- epsilon.value
numeric value to be added to both
simandobswhenepsilon.type="otherValue".
Details
$$md = 1 - \frac{ \sum_{i=1}^N {\left| O_i - S_i \right| ^j} } { \sum_{i=1}^N { \left| S_i - \bar{O} \right| + \left| O_i - \bar{O} \right|^j } } $$
The Index of Agreement (d) developed by Willmott (1981) as a standardized measure of the degree of model prediction error and varies between 0 and 1.
A value of 1 indicates a perfect match, and 0 indicates no agreement at all (Willmott, 1981).
The index of agreement can detect additive and proportional differences in the observed and simulated means and variances; however, it is overly sensitive to extreme values due to the squared differences (Legates and McCabe, 1999).
Value
Modified index of agreement between sim and obs.
If sim and obs are matrixes, the returned value is a vector, with the modified index of agreement between each column of sim and obs.
References
Krause, P.; Boyle, D.P.; Base, F. (2005). Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment, Advances in Geosciences, 5, 89-97. doi:10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005.
Willmott, C.J. (1981). On the validation of models. Physical Geography, 2, 184–194. doi:10.1080/02723646.1981.10642213.
Willmott, C.J. (1984). On the evaluation of model performance in physical geography. Spatial Statistics and Models, G. L. Gaile and C. J. Willmott, eds., 443-460. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-3048-8_23.
Willmott, C.J.; Ackleson, S.G. Davis, R.E.; Feddema, J.J.; Klink, K.M.; Legates, D.R.; O'Donnell, J.; Rowe, C.M. (1985), Statistics for the Evaluation and Comparison of Models, J. Geophys. Res., 90(C5), 8995-9005. doi:10.1029/JC090iC05p08995.
Legates, D.R.; McCabe, G. J. Jr. (1999), Evaluating the Use of "Goodness-of-Fit" Measures in Hydrologic and Hydroclimatic Model Validation, Water Resour. Res., 35(1), 233-241. doi:10.1029/1998WR900018.
Note
obs and sim has to have the same length/dimension
The missing values in obs and sim are removed before the computation proceeds, and only those positions with non-missing values in obs and sim are considered in the computation
Examples
obs <- 1:10
sim <- 1:10
md(sim, obs)
#> [1] 1
obs <- 1:10
sim <- 2:11
md(sim, obs)
#> [1] 0.8039216
##################
# Loading daily streamflows of the Ega River (Spain), from 1961 to 1970
data(EgaEnEstellaQts)
obs <- EgaEnEstellaQts
# Generating a simulated daily time series, initially equal to the observed series
sim <- obs
# Computing the modified index of agreement for the "best" (unattainable) case
md(sim=sim, obs=obs)
#> [1] 1
# Randomly changing the first 2000 elements of 'sim', by using a normal distribution
# with mean 10 and standard deviation equal to 1 (default of 'rnorm').
sim[1:2000] <- obs[1:2000] + rnorm(2000, mean=10)
# Computing the new 'd1'
md(sim=sim, obs=obs)
#> [1] 0.7824876